Archive

29 December 2003

Bringing services closer to users

New software tools aim to make services more accessible to business analysts and users when assembling composite applications:
  • Implementing SOA is only a first step towards practical reuse
  • Raw services can't be reused without specialist skills
  • Contextual information makes services more accessible to other users
  • Reusing the user interface logic lowers the adoption curve
  • Flexible service assembly enables user-centric application design
Bringing services closer to users

25 December 2003

InfoWorld Nederland: WS apocalypse

On Infoworld today, an article by Sander: The web services apocalypse

Product Content Management

"What is PCM (Product Content Management)? Many vendors talk about enterprise-wide data repositories for non-transactional product information within large organizations. But true PCM means more than just the centralized repository to eliminate data duplication with a limited sprinkle of functionality; rather, the repository must be capable of storing all product information, the system must be more than a point solution or an island, it must offer high-performance access to that information, and it must include tightly integrated functionality that can be used to drive all enterprise initiatives."
Line56.com: Product Content Management

17 December 2003

Fit for web services management

Some enterprises are finding that smaller, specialist web services management vendors offer a better match for their needs than the better-known names:
  • Each vendor adds its own extras to the core offering
  • Some manage from a systems perspective, others take a business angle
  • Many prefer network-based brokers to endpoint agents
  • Most specialize in certain vertical industries
  • Each encounters a different subset of the enterprise market
Fit for web services management

09 December 2003

The OSS Fear Factor

"Ask a group of corporate IT leaders whether they'd rather stick their arms into a box of tarantulas or allow open source software (OSS) on their networks, and odds are most would start rolling up their sleeves.

In this security-conscious era, getting IT or business leaders to consider using OSS can be a tough sell. One of the main reasons is a perceived lack of control - or a throat to choke to put it another way. If you purchase packaged software, you know who's responsible. If you're using Microsoft Outlook and some knucklehead exploits a hole to distribute a virus to your user base, all eyes turn to Redmond for a patch. But if you're using Evolution and a similar problem occurs, to whom do you turn for a remedy? (See Myth #4 for the answer.)"

Line56.com: The OSS Fear Factor

05 December 2003

InfoWorld Nederland

On Infoworld, an article by Sander about portal implementations: The Introduction of a Portal

01 December 2003

Debuggers are a wasteful Timesink

"As debuggers have grown in power and capability, they have become more and more harmful to the process of software development.

Debuggers have become immensely powerful. A good debugger is a very capable tool. With it, an experienced developer can step through very complex code, look at all the variables, data structures, and stack frames; even modify the code and continue. And yet, for all their power, debuggers have done more to damage software development than help it."

Debuggers are a wasteful Timesink

You are trying to view the newsticker in a browser that doesn't support it. I am sorry.